Foreign policyFormer Brexit secretary denounces plan and says 42% budget cut risks killing thousands of people
Proposed foreign aid cuts are immoral, unlawful and ministers tried to push them through without a vote in the Commons because they knew they would lose, the former Brexit secretary and Conservative backbench MP David Davis has said.
Davis told BBC Radio 4s Today programme that the UK was unique among the G7 in planning the 42% cut, and said it would kill thousands of people. He cited legal advice given to Tory backbenchers by Ken Macdonald in which he denounced the planned cuts.
The government, if it wanted to do this, should have brought it to the House of Commons and said: This is in our manifesto but the duress were facing now means we have to do this and so ask the house to approve it. It didnt.
The reason it didnt was because the majority of the house doesnt agree with it. Thats what were going see today if we get the vote. And Im afraid that thats frankly, in my judgment, a morally poor position for the government.
David Davis: A morally poor position. Composite: PA
Ministers have been warned that the proposals, which call for about £4bn in cuts, would leave about 70,000 people in the worlds largest refugee settlement without health services. About 100,000 refugees in Coxs Bazar, Bangladesh, would also be without water before the deadly cyclone season, aid agencies said.
In the run-up to a possible Commons vote on Monday, a group of those working in the area wrote to the Foreign Office minister for Asia, Nigel Adams. They warned that the cuts would significantly undermine efforts to address humanitarian needs in the camp.
On Monday, the former prime minister Gordon Brown said now was not the time for the cuts. He told BBC Breakfast: Its a life-and-death issue, were actually deciding who lives and who dies, particularly at this point where if we withdraw the money for vaccination its the equivalent of pulling away the needle from a kid or from an adult who is sick who needs the vaccination, a 90% cut, for example, in support for polio vaccination.
He added: Were about to get a huge payment from the International Monetary Fund of $23bn, that covers this cut six times over, so it makes absolutely no economic sense. But particularly no moral sense. And its in our self-interest, of course, to see the others vaccinated because nobody is safe until everybody is safe.
Boris Johnson has persisted with the plan, believing it to be politically popular despite a rebellion by his own MPs, including the former international development secretary Andrew Mitchell and the former prime minister Theresa May.
The government has insisted the reduction of foreign aid from 0.7% of national income to 0.5%, which breaches the Tory manifesto, would be temporary.
The solicitor general, Lucy Frazer, told Sky News on Monday: Even without the 0.7% this year, we will be investing £10bn and that is really important, but we are in the middle of a pandemic.
What weve said is of course international aid needs to be spent but were going to temporarily cease the 0.7% and bring it back when fiscal circumstances allow.
Davis said: If you are a small child and you then suddenly get dirty water, you get an infection from it and you die, temporary doesnt mean much.
{{#ticker}}{{topLeft}}
{{bottomLeft}}
{{topRight}}
{{bottomRight}}
{{#goalExceededMarkerPercentage}}{{/goalExceededMarkerPercentage}}
{{/ticker}}{{#paragraphs}}{{.}}
{{/paragraphs}}{{highlightedText}}
We will be in touch to remind you to contribute. Look out for a message in your inbox in July 2021. If you have any questions about contributing, please contact us.

You may also like